Policy Documents
Decisions & Orders

Document Sub-category:Exemption Orders (Discretionary)
Document No.:2005/09/16
Subject:Teal Energy Inc. [MRRS]
Amendments:
Published Date:09/28/2005
Effective Date:09/16/2005

______________________________

2005 BCSECCOM 608.pdf
Click on the Adobe icon to launch the Acrobat Reader

2005 BCSECCOM 608

September 16, 2005


Headnote
Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications - Securities Act s. 114(2) Takeover Bids - Exemption from the formal take over bid requirements in Part 13 of the Act - Issuer requires relief from prohibition against certain collateral agreements in s. 107(2) of the Act - The offeror issuer has entered into a collateral agreement with a shareholder of the offeree issuer; the agreement is entered into for valid business reasons, and not for the purpose of providing the shareholder with a benefit beyond what other shareholders of the offeree issuer will receive under the offer

Applicable British Columbia Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 418, ss. 107(2), 114(2)(a)
In the Matter of
the Securities Legislation of
British Columbia, Alberta, and Ontario (the Jurisdictions)

and

In the Matter of
the Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications

and

In the Matter of
Teal Energy Inc. (the Filer)

MRRS Decision Document

Background
1. The local securities regulatory authority or regulator (the Decision Maker) in each of the Jurisdictions has received an application from the Filer for a decision under the securities legislation of the Jurisdictions (the Legislation) that, in connection with the offer (Offer) by the Filer to acquire all of the issued and outstanding common shares (GE Shares) and options (the GE Options) of Golden Eagle Energy Ltd. (Golden Eagle), the Employment Agreements (as defined below) are being made for reasons other than to increase the value of the consideration paid for those GE Shares and GE Options (collectively, the GE Securities) that are owned or controlled by the Management Security Holders (as defined below) and may be entered into notwithstanding the requirements contained in the Legislation which prohibit, in the context of a take-over bid, the entering into of any collateral agreement, commitment or understanding with any holder or beneficial owner of securities of the offeree issuer that has the effect of providing to the holder or owner consideration of greater value than that offered to holders of the same class of securities (the Requested Relief).

2. Under the Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications (the MRRS):
Interpretation
3. Defined terms contained in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions have the same meaning in this decision unless they are defined in this decision.

Representations
4. This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:
Decision
5. Each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that the test contained in the Legislation that provides the Decision Maker with the jurisdiction to make the Decision has been met.

6. The decision of the Decision Makers under the Legislation is that the Requested Relief is granted.